 |
DG CAPITAL ADVISORS CLIENT MEMORANDA
Briefly Noted: Data Shower
July 14, 2000
David Gitlitz
Today’s shower
of data fell on a market that knows any hint of present or future inflation
remains non-existent, but must stay ever-wary of a
Fed
that remains committed to output-gap austerity. After initially rallying to
their best levels in three months at a yield below 5.80% on word of June
core producer prices declining by 0.1%, long-term Treasuries could not
withstand the beating being taken at the short end of the yield curve. While
the 30-year bond took a near full-point loss, pushing the yield to 5.88%,
the two-year note suffered a 12 basis-point rout, back above the 6.4% level,
with the yield curve inversion deepening to more than 50 bps for the first
time in two weeks. With the market’s optimism that the Fed was at or near
the end of its tightening cycle now in doubt,
Alan Greenspan’s
scheduled Senate Banking Committee
testimony next Thursday takes on even greater urgency.
A major
factor in today’s expectations shift, it seems, was the revision of previous
months’ retail sales data. Ex-autos, June sales gains actually came in
weaker than expected, at 0.2% versus expectations of 0.3%. What surprised
the market, and no doubt put an “I-told-you-so” grin on the face of
Laurence Meyer and his Phillips-Curve brethren, was the update of the
May release showing a 0.3% gain versus an originally reported 0.3% decline.
As one report noted, release of the initial May number last month was one of
the key indicators in the then-developing slowdown scenario. Of course,
two-month-old data on consumer consumption behavior is entirely irrelevant
to current or expected inflation. As noted here yesterday, though, the Fed’s
lagging fine-tuning approach requires that contemporaneous policy decisions
be based on data reflecting past economic performance. Even today’s report
that industrial production rose by just 0.2%, its slowest pace of growth
since last September, wasn’t enough to turn back the bearish tide. Under the
Fed’s output-gap model, even a slower pace of “aggregate demand” growth
could remain well above the level deemed to represent “sustainability.” |